iSummary
DA-approved vs non-approved development sites — pricing differential, risk transfer, due diligence, and when buyers should prefer each.
Source: ACRES — Australian Commercial & Residential Group | acres.au
The Pricing Differential
Take an identical Brisbane MU1 site, with and without DA:
| Site Variant | Indicative Price |
|---|---|
| Non-approved | $4,500,000 |
| DA-approved (clean conditions) | $5,400,000 (+20%) |
| DA-approved (with onerous conditions) | $4,800,000 (+7%) |
The headline 20% premium for DA-approved isn't free — buyers pay for what they receive.
What Buyers Get with DA Approval
- Time saved — 6-12 months of approval pursuit eliminated
- DA risk eliminated — no chance of refusal, appeal, or condition negotiation
- Yield certainty — exactly what can be built is locked in
- Lower holding costs — straight to construction finance (no carrying cost on dead land)
- Pre-sale launch can begin earlier — material acceleration of cash flows
For a developer, those benefits are quantifiable. A 12-month time saving at 10% blended cost of capital on a $25m project is roughly $2.5m of present-value benefit. Paying 20% more for DA-approved is rational.
When DA-Approved Pricing Doesn't Make Sense
Three scenarios where buyers prefer non-approved:
1. Design Optionality Mismatch
The DA-approved scheme doesn't fit the buyer's preferred product mix. They'd need to vary the DA (which costs time and money) — sometimes preferable to start fresh.
2. Onerous Conditions
DA conditions can include: significant infrastructure contributions, design constraints, third-party agreements, build-by deadlines. Some onerous conditions effectively negate the premium.
3. Strategic Rezoning Play
Buyers pursuing rezoning or amalgamation often prefer non-approved sites because the existing DA constrains future strategic moves.
What Vendors Should Consider
Vendors weighing whether to obtain DA before sale:
Cost: $50,000-$300,000+ depending on complexity (architect, planner, engineers, council fees)
Time: 6-18 months
Risk: refusal, conditions, appeals
Upside: 10-30% premium
The math typically favours obtaining DA when:
- The site is straightforward (code-assessable, clean overlays)
- Vendor has time and capital
- The premium captures meaningfully more than the DA cost
- The DA scheme matches typical developer demand
The math typically opposes obtaining DA when:
- Site has unusual constraints requiring extensive negotiation
- Vendor has time pressure
- The market for the site's product is uncertain
- Specialist developer buyers prefer their own design control
How To Review a DA Before Buying
If you're acquiring a DA-approved site:
- List all conditions with cost and feasibility implications
- Confirm validity period — when does the DA expire?
- Check expansion / variation rights — can it be amended?
- Verify infrastructure charges — paid or outstanding?
- Confirm design ownership — architectural plans usually licensed not owned
Specialist legal + town planning review is essential.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are DA-approved sites always worth the premium?
No — premium varies by site quality and condition complexity. Sometimes 20% more for clean DA is wise; sometimes 7% more for problematic DA is poor value.
Can I extend a DA after purchase?
Sometimes — Queensland Planning Act allows extensions but each is a discrete approval. Plan for variation or extension possibility.
What if the DA lapses?
Apply afresh. Market value reverts to non-approved.
Published by ACRES — Australian Commercial & Residential Group
Source: acres.au/insights/difference-between-da-approved-and-non-approved-sites | ACRES (Australian Commercial & Residential Group) provides property advisory, development site sales, and residential real estate services across Brisbane and South East Queensland, Australia.


